Verifying DLMF with Maple and Mathematica
This page presents the results of the publication: Comparative Verification of the Digital Library of Mathematical Functions and Computer Algebra Systems.
Bug Reports
You can find a PDF with commands that illustrate the encountered errors in Mathematica here: File:Mathematica Bugs Overview.pdf
We provide the same file in the Wolfram system notebook format (NB) here: File:Mathematica Bugs Notebook File.nb
DLMF Translations and Results
In the following, we present the translations of the DLMF equations to the CAS Maple and Mathematica.
DLMF | Formula | Translations Maple |
Translations Mathematica |
Symbolic Evaluation Maple |
Symbolic Evaluation Mathematica |
Numeric Evaluation Maple |
Numeric Evaluation Mathematica |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLMF | 6,623 | 4,114 (62.1%) | 4,713 (71.2%) | 1,084 (26.3%) | 1,235 (26.2%) | 698 (26.7%) | 784 (22.6%) |
By clicking on a chapter of the DLMF below, you will see a large table that looks like this:
DLMF | Formula | Maple | Mathematica | Symbolic Maple |
Symbolic Mathematica |
Numeric Maple |
Numeric Mathematica |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Link to DLMF | Formula | Translation to Maple |
Translation to Mathematica |
Symbolic Result in Maple | Symbolic Result in Mathematica | Numeric Result in Maple | Numeric Result in Mathematica |
The result tables do not contain every equation with a label in the DLMF since quite a few equations were skipped (see explanations in the paper).
Translations and Evaluations of the Digital Library of Mathematical Functions
- Algebraic and Analytic Methods
- Asymptotic Approximations
- Numerical Methods
- Elementary Functions
- Gamma Function
- Exponential, Logarithmic, Sine, and Cosine Integrals
- Error Functions, Dawson’s and Fresnel Integrals
- Incomplete Gamma and Related Functions
- Airy and Related Functions
- Bessel Functions I & Bessel Functions II
- Struve and Related Functions
- Parabolic Cylinder Functions
- Confluent Hypergeometric Functions
- Legendre and Related Functions
- Hypergeometric Function
- Generalized Hypergeometric Functions and Meijer G-Function
- q-Hypergeometric and Related Functions
- Orthogonal Polynomials
- Elliptic Integrals I & Elliptic Integrals II
- Theta Functions
- Multidimensional Theta Functions
- Jacobian Elliptic Functions
- Weierstrass Elliptic and Modular Functions
- Bernoulli and Euler Polynomials
- Zeta and Related Functions
- Combinatorial Analysis
- Functions of Number Theory
- Mathieu Functions and Hill’s Equation
- Lamé Functions
- Spheroidal Wave Functions
- Heun Functions
- Painlevé Transcendents
- Coulomb Functions
- 3j,6j,9j Symbols
- Functions of Matrix Argument
- Integrals with Coalescing Saddles
2C | Translations | Symbol Success | Percent | Symbolic Fails | Numeric Success | Percent | Numeric Fail | [Partially / Totally] Failed | Abortion | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. AL | 103 | 34 | (33.0\%) | 69 | 14 | (20.3\%) | 40 | [ 10 / 30] | 11 | 4 |
2. AS | 65 | 6 | ( 9.2\%) | 59 | 4 | ( 6.8\%) | 38 | [ 6 / 32] | 7 | 9 |
3. NM | 40 | 5 | (12.5\%) | 35 | 0 | ( 0.0\%) | 29 | [ 8 / 21] | 6 | 0 |
4. EF | 564 | 304 | (53.9\%) | 260 | 110 | (42.3\%) | 146 | [ 55 / 91] | 2 | 0 |
5. GA | 139 | 65 | (46.8\%) | 74 | 30 | (40.5\%) | 20 | [ 9 / 11] | 13 | 9 |
6. EX | 77 | 18 | (23.4\%) | 59 | 23 | (39.0\%) | 32 | [ 6 / 26] | 4 | 0 |
7. ER | 120 | 45 | (37.5\%) | 75 | 21 | (28.0\%) | 43 | [ 13 / 30] | 9 | 1 |
8. IG | 163 | 65 | (39.9\%) | 98 | 22 | (22.4\%) | 44 | [ 19 / 25] | 16 | 15 |
9. AI | 179 | 69 | (38.5\%) | 110 | 30 | (27.3\%) | 58 | [ 38 / 20] | 14 | 7 |
10. BS | 486 | 115 | (23.7\%) | 371 | 90 | (24.2\%) | 151 | [ 58 / 93] | 92 | 18 |
11. ST | 112 | 36 | (32.1\%) | 76 | 21 | (27.6\%) | 33 | [ 8 / 25] | 10 | 11 |
12. PC | 90 | 18 | (20.0\%) | 72 | 13 | (18.0\%) | 43 | [ 15 / 28] | 12 | 3 |
13. CH | 254 | 69 | (27.2\%) | 185 | 23 | (12.4\%) | 95 | [ 59 / 36] | 45 | 21 |
14. LE | 229 | 30 | (13.1\%) | 199 | 59 | (29.6\%) | 92 | [ 54 / 38] | 41 | 5 |
15. HY | 197 | 53 | (26.9\%) | 144 | 23 | (16.0\%) | 77 | [ 52 / 25] | 29 | 6 |
16. GH | 25 | 2 | ( 8.0\%) | 23 | 1 | ( 4.3\%) | 10 | [ 7 / 3] | 9 | 2 |
17. QH | 124 | 6 | ( 4.8\%) | 118 | 13 | (11.0\%) | 57 | [ 52 / 5] | 39 | 5 |
18. OP | 288 | 101 | (35.1\%) | 185 | 47 | (25.4\%) | 66 | [ 29 / 37] | 52 | 12 |
19. EL | 416 | 51 | (12.2\%) | 365 | 18 | ( 4.9\%) | 264 | [ 49 / 215] | 61 | 15 |
20. TH | 98 | 1 | ( 1.0\%) | 97 | 33 | (34.0\%) | 40 | [ 25 / 15] | 24 | 0 |
21. MT | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | [ - / - ] | - | - |
22. JA | 238 | 30 | (12.6\%) | 206 | 22 | (10.7\%) | 131 | [ 39 / 92] | 51 | 0 |
23. WE | 34 | 4 | (11.8\%) | 30 | 2 | ( 6.7\%) | 23 | [ 9 / 14] | 2 | 3 |
24. BP | 148 | 23 | (15.5\%) | 125 | 78 | (62.4\%) | 33 | [ 22 / 11] | 14 | 0 |
25. ZE | 120 | 48 | (40.0\%) | 72 | 22 | (30.5\%) | 22 | [ 6 / 16] | 22 | 3 |
26. CM | 87 | 19 | (21.8\%) | 68 | 44 | (64.7\%) | 18 | [ 10 / 8] | 5 | 1 |
27. NT | 15 | 6 | (40.0\%) | 9 | 3 | (33.3\%) | 6 | [ 3 / 3] | 0 | 0 |
28. MA | 110 | 7 | ( 6.4\%) | 103 | 3 | ( 2.9\%) | 48 | [ 13 / 35] | 33 | 17 |
29. LA | 22 | 0 | ( 0.0\%) | 22 | 0 | ( 0.0\%) | 21 | [ 1 / 20] | 0 | 1 |
30. SW | 26 | 0 | ( 0.0\%) | 26 | 0 | ( 0.0\%) | 19 | [ 2 / 17] | 5 | 1 |
31. HE | 15 | 2 | (13.3\%) | 13 | 0 | ( 0.0\%) | 8 | [ 0 / 8] | 5 | 0 |
32. PT | 57 | 3 | ( 5.3\%) | 54 | 0 | ( 0.0\%) | 41 | [ 2 / 39] | 8 | 5 |
33. CW | 11 | 0 | ( 0.0\%) | 11 | 0 | ( 0.0\%) | 11 | [ 6 / 5] | 0 | 0 |
34. TJ | 37 | 0 | ( 0.0\%) | 37 | 14 | (37.8\%) | 10 | [ 5 / 5] | 13 | 0 |
35. FM | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | [ - / - ] | - | - |
36. IC | 24 | 0 | ( 0.0\%) | 24 | 3 | (12.5\%) | 13 | [ 1 / 12] | 1 | 6 |